iPhone vs Android – Touch ID vs Fingerprint scanner
Fingerprint sensors exist on virtually every smartphone, but which is better in terms of implementation: iPhone or Android?
Smartphone convergence – in terms of hardware and design – is a major challenge for all handset manufacturers, especially for Android device manufacturers.
The only way for them to remain substantially ahead of the competition is to significantly improve user experience. A better user experience must be based on faster speed and higher accuracy.
Fingerprint scanner is one way to differentiate. After Apple's acquisition of AuthenTech, the iPhone 5s introduced its Touch ID – leading Android manufacturers to follow suit.
Google implemented native fingerprint recognition in its very latest Android M OS, making it more convenient for Android device makers to implement this function.
Generally speaking, the best experience of this technology comes from Apple devices.
Implemented directly into its HOME button, Touch ID allows users to unconsciously become accustomed to its convenience and speed. This quickly became a unique differentiated selling point for the iPhone.
While Touch ID grants users faster access, there are still several drawbacks.
Touch ID can ensure the safety of smartphone use, but it also can be a potential risk factor as our fingerprints can be easily left behind anywhere we touch. In short, our fingerprint can be easily copied.
This means the iPhone will recognize someone who is not the real owner, raising the risk profile of this kind of technology.
As we all know that Touch ID sensor is built directly into the HOME button, making unlocking faster and more convenient.
However, this has some unintentional consequences: a lot of times, the user presses the Home button just to check the time without wanting to unlock the iPhone. This kind of design issue is the one that affects users most directly due to frequency.
Compared with the high sensitivity of Touch ID, the fingerprint sensor of Android devices lacks similar advantage, however it can perform more novel unlock methods.
In addition to the conventional unlock function, Google also provides more API for developers. As a result, the fingerprint identification can be applied to more places – not simply being limited to the HOME button.
Most Android devices have their fingerprint sensor located on the back cover of the phone, allowing users to freely choose the unlock method they want. This can also avoid the problem of activating the UI by accident like on the iPhone.
In terms of fingerprint recognition technique, iPhone has an advantage undoubtedly, but in other areas, Android OS may actually offer a better overall user experience.
|You may also want to read:|
|Android / iOS Guide | Setting up a second phone number|
|How to use phone hotspot on Android iPhone & WinPhone?|
For the purpose of this new article, the featured image(s) were sourced from the internet. For any issue, please contact us, and we will deal with the matter promptly.
Prev article: Car gear: 5 EASY tips to make your suction cups stick
Next article: How to test if your balance scooter charger is broken
You might also like:
2017-02-19 By Zim Watson
2017-02-14 By Zim Watson
2017-04-20 By Zim Watson